The theme of the Democratic Convention is "Unity". In this case, unity against Trump and the GOP. Yet, recent events have shown that unity be out of their reach. This apparent disunity is because of the revelation of the Democratic Party's disenfranchisement torwards its progressive wing, represented by the supporters of Bernie Sanders.
The cracks were already showing before the convention. An earlier article I've written discussed ways that Hillary had withdrawn on her promise of a more progressive platform even before Sanders' misguided endorsement of Clinton. The retreat from fighting for progressive policy and a return to Third Way policies further intensified with Clinton's appointment of Tim Kaine as her Vice President pick. This is because Tim Kaine has expressed support for the TPP as an "upgrade for labour standards"(he was one of the 13 senators that wanted Obama to fast track this act through Congress), as well as pro-fracking positions and support for the Hyde Act. The Hyde Act prohibits federal funding for abortions under Medicaid — the repeal of which is called for in the Democratic Party’s own platform promising unlimited federal funding of abortions. Kaine was also known to support "tough on crime" policies such as Project Exile, which gave long prison sentences to thoseconvicted on illegal firearm ownership. This law has bee accused of targeting the black population and feeding the prison-industrial complex. Thus, it is contradictory for Hillary to promise a leftward shift, yet have a center-right neoliberal VP with policies contradictory to all her promises.
Showing posts with label DNC Corruption. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DNC Corruption. Show all posts
Wednesday, 3 August 2016
Monday, 18 July 2016
Thoughts on Bernie Sanders' endorsement of Hillary Clinton
On July 12th, 2016, Bernie Sanders endorsed Hillary Clinton in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. He concedes the nomination to Hillary Clinton. He congratulates her on the nomination and states he will do whatever it takes to allow her to become president to ensure a Democratic victory on November 8th. He praises Hillary's supposed promises to create a living wage, as well as to rebuild crumbling infrastructure. This will of course contrast with Trump's plan to nominate a right-wing Supreme Court Justice and to cut minimum ages.
While this move has finally ended Bernie Sanders' conflict with the Democratic Party, it has split Sanders' progressive base. Some believe that Sanders made the right decision, rooted in his earlier promises that he will endorse Clinton to defeat Donald Trump. They believe that the threat of Donald Trump and the alt-right eclipses any sort of protest that could be achieved by voting Third Party. Thus it is wrong to support Green Party presumptive nominee Jill Stein because all that would do is take away votes from Clinton, viewing Trump's plans to be detrimental to a progressive America because of his far-right polices. Others believe that the Sanders' "Political Revolution" laid the grounds for genuine independence from the Democratic Party through an independent Left. Consequently, they view Sanders' endorsement as a sell-out or a betrayal. When looking at these arguments, I feel that, while Bernie Sanders may not have sold out(at least in my opinion), the latter camp is in the right, and that it was wrong for Bernie Sanders to have endorsed Hillary at this stage of the campaign. That is because Hillary's behavior often makes it hard to believe that she would stay true to fighting for a progressive campaign, and this was in fact reflected in certain campaign decisions that was made by her as the convention neared. Likewise, if she becomes president, it would not be guaranteed if she would actually move to implement more progressive policies because of the supreme court of whatnot as, much of which has come about as progressive policies was due to grassroots activism.
It also bears noting that this endorsement could actually benefits the alt-right, whom would use Bernie's endorsement to paint Bernie as "corrupt" or no different than the rest. This will be contrasted with Trump, who would be seen as "incorruptible" and the only one to "deliver" America from corruption.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
